In this blog, we will take a look at a recent project and how the costs compare when the meter is moved from the meter vault to the backflow cover.
The project is located in the northeast. The water jurisdiction provides a standard detail where the water meter and backflow assembly are installed in an ASSE 1060 Class 1 enclosure. The contractor was installing an 8” water meter and an 8” backflow assembly. These figures were provided by a utility contractor. In this example, the cost was almost the same.
8” meter vault including valves but not installed - $11,200 contractor price
Backflow cover for 8” backflow assembly - $6,500 contractor price
Concrete slab for backflow assembly enclosure - $1,500 contractor price
Total Cost - $19,200
Larger backflow cover required for meter and backflow assembly - $13,200 contractor price
Additional gate valves and fittings - $2,700 contractor price
Larger concrete slab required for larger backflow enclosure - $3,000 contractor price
Total Cost - $18,900
Two additional costs not considered in the comparison that should be considered in the cost evaluation:
Some water jurisdictions are changing to ultrasonic meters for applications requiring a 3” meter or larger. This type of water meter eliminates the need for long straight pipe runs before and after the meter. And when these straight runs are eliminated, the backflow cover does not need to be as long.
On a recent project, the length of the backflow cover was reduced by 48” due to the use of the ultrasonic meter. This created sizable cost savings for the project.
As a design engineer, look for the best practices for meter and backflow preventer design. Change is not easy and requires a commitment to pursue what is best. Reach out to us if you want to talk about your next project. When it comes to water jurisdictions, we’ve worked with several across the county and would be willing to provide our support as you make these changes in your jurisdiction. Reach out to us and we’ll be glad to help you make these important changes.